You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Sugar Profile between Leaves and Fruits of Blueberry and Strawberry Cultivars Grown in Organic and Integrated Production System
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plants, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/plants8070205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milica Fotirić Akšić, Tomislav Tosti, Milica Sredojević, Jasminka Milivojević, Mekjell Meland, Maja Natić |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,524,966
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Plants
#2,209
of 4,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,252
of 348,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plants
#37
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,912 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.