You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can Government Public Communications Elicit Undue Trust? Exploring the Interaction between Symbols and Substantive Information in Communications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muz013 |
| Authors |
Saar Alon-Barkat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 23% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Sudan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,479,993
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#150
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,224
of 363,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them