RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
Tutto ⬇️⬇️
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
RT @andcapocci: Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019,…
Thread sui mille miliardi di alberi.
Il G20 ha deciso di piantare 10¹² alberi per assorbire CO₂. Il dibattito sulla «riforestazione» ebbe una fiammata nel 2019, quando uscì questo paper su @sciencemag che descriveva l'impatto positivo di piantarne la metà. Successe un casino. (1/n) https://t.
RT @mdiparbleu: La base scientifica? C’è e non c’è. È tutta colpa di uno studio “groundbreaking” su Science che ha scosso la comunità scien…
#COP26: The global #tree restoration potential. #climatechange #climateaction https://t.co/xsdVROE6Bh
This reference shows that there is almost 1 billion hectares of land (not used for agriculture) where tree restoration could take place. https://t.co/dRYhvtLetS
Das wären – laut Studie – zwei Drittel des Kohlenstoffs, den wir seit 1850 in die Atmosphäre blasen. Das wäre die effektivste Maßnahme gegen den Klimawandel. Eine starke Ansage. https://t.co/hOoKUlhNMA
@herrfischer @ScienceMagazine Corrected, not retracted (Science also published four critical technical comments on the study): https://t.co/SeoyvZRlqd
@itatiVCS @dendromecon27 @Seiurus Are you referring to Bastin et al 2019? At first glance, no co-authors on that paper are part of the https://t.co/LaPnr1glZH project. And none of the funding for Bastin et al came from WWF, WCS, or BirdLife who are running
RT @mateo_tao: @ElwiraRosiak @NatureCanada This is unacceptable. There are so many studies that prove reforestation is essential. The rest…
@ElwiraRosiak @NatureCanada This is unacceptable. There are so many studies that prove reforestation is essential. The restoration of forested land at a global scale could help capture atmospheric carbon and mitigate climate crisis. Just one of many other
The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/nOc4CH1OV6
@mimccarthyflynn @seanieb @SadhbhO @BroadLeafPod @NaturallyOrla @CarbonMrktWatch This study seems the best estimate so far achieved on how much/where/. You need to talk to environmental scientists and botanists about the what goes where of course. https:/
RT @VeganSchool: “Ecosystems could support an additional 0.9 billion ha of continuous forest... a greater than 25% increase in forested are…
“Ecosystems could support an additional 0.9 billion ha of continuous forest... a greater than 25% increase in forested area, including more than 200Gt of additional carbon at maturity... potential to store... 25% of the current atmospheric carbon pool.” ht
@Aya80526326 原典と思しき論文です。アブストラクトだけ読みましたが、当該の記述はなく、炭素と二酸化炭素どちらが正解かわかりません。 https://t.co/thVr6g3kb8
@RoxanneLJames I cannot physically show you, but I will link to studies done on this subject. Now you are just making things up - I never said “Just plant more trees, then we are saved”. https://t.co/V7eljkY7Iu https://t.co/Sn82lAiAsw https://t.co/MEMNQ
@fuecks Aufforstung. 💪 https://t.co/3NnSML3Ptz
@MariPantsar Tuohan ei ole tiedelehdessä julkaistu artikkeli. Tämän Science-tiedelehdessä julkaistun vertaisarvioidun tutkimuksen mukaan metsitys olisi tärkein ja kustannustehokkain keino torjua ilmastonmuutosta. 1/2 https://t.co/fALIvMg0ea
Come join a project that is not only ameliorating climate change, but helping local communities in need while doing so. Every token minted = a tree planted + more goes to donations. Great art, great mission.
"Ecosystems could support an additional 0.9 billion hectares of continuous forest. This would represent a greater than 25% increase in forested area, including more than 200 gigatonnes of additional carbon at maturity." 🌳🌲🌱💚 full article here: https://t.c
@collabfund @elonmusk Simpliest idea ?... https://t.co/m8LEgEuOrU
@SouthernOceanPV @simonahac https://t.co/zjyQKzB1Mc This study - which has been widely criticized as fantasy - still only estimates that it would buy 20 years at current emissions. That's a decent chunk of time, but we have far more than 20 years worth of
@JrmeLabb1 Si c'est bien fait ça peut aider à capter pas mal de CO2, mais je suis d'accord qu'il ne faut pas simplement regarder le nombre d'arbres si ceux-ci ne survivent pas ou sont plantés dans des zones non propices. https://t.co/ev33XrC5Dt https://t.
@onnoniem @TomvanderLee We zijn tussen 1990 en 2020 even zoveel hectaren aan bomen verloren als de totale oppervlakte van Zuid Afrika. Daarnaast hebben bomen een verkoelend effect. https://t.co/mt3VyO7efz
@Fiorella_im @_whitneywebb The restoration of trees remains among the most effective strategies for climate change mitigation. Studies of the ETH, a leading Swiss University. In german https://t.co/eYJS8f81uV and also ~> The global tree restoration po
By maximising the amount of trees we plant globally, we could maybe cater for about 25% of the atmospheric #carbon pool. This means we could do 1000x more tree planting globally, and still reach only 1/4 of the way for tilting the balance on #globalwarming
La base scientifica? C’è e non c’è. È tutta colpa di uno studio “groundbreaking” su Science che ha scosso la comunità scientifica nel 2019 con cui l’ETH di Zurigo mostrava il potenziale di riforestazione del Pianeta. Questo -> https://t.co/yTHYW2OHIi
@AukeHoekstra @MargrietKuijper @ppget59 @IvoTenHagen @Vision23 @peterjwever @klimaatVeranda @marjanminnesma @BVerheggen @DJvtV22 @HeleendeConinck @frantecol @RikHJHarmsen @BM_Visser Ja, er is aardig wat landoppervlak met weinig vegetatie en niet in gebruik
@Rembem2 @kees_klomp_ In een publicatie in Science in 2019, werd er gesteld dat het - in principe - wél mogelijk zou zijn om groot deel CO2-emissies zo te compenseren. Dat bleek op rekenfouten te berusten. De correctie staat in rood aangegeven: https://t
The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/OzUm4XmFSa
The Global Tree Restoration Potential https://t.co/Awqq5eqg43 #GIS #spatial #mapping #ClimateChange #mitigation #spatialanalysis #remotesensing #DataVisualization #Vegetation #trees #global #forests #CarbonCapture #modeling #RCP #EarthSystemModels #Machi
Jos kaikkien nykyisten metsien annettaisiin vapaasti kasvaa ja jo hakatut metsät ennallistettaisiin, voitaisiin sitoa 2/3 ilmakehän hiilidioksidista. https://t.co/6l4YikMx8z
Ti sei mai chiesto quanto alberi dovremmo piantare per arginare il #riscaldamentoglobale? La scienza l’ha fatto! Ecco i risultati! Fonte: https://t.co/fQm0MXlGz9 https://t.co/hJIfUSVNEy
RT @bateko71: Los ecosistemas podrían soportar 900 millones de hectáreas adicionales de bosque continuo. Esto representaría un aumento de m…
RT @bateko71: Los ecosistemas podrían soportar 900 millones de hectáreas adicionales de bosque continuo. Esto representaría un aumento de m…
Los ecosistemas podrían soportar 900 millones de hectáreas adicionales de bosque continuo. Esto representaría un aumento de más del 25% en el área boscosa. Tal cambio tiene el potencial de almacenar un el 25% de la reserva de carbono atmosférico actual. ht
The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/aRQ4QRKWS6
@dobbyloca Yo sé que ustedes creen que a AMLO solo se le ocurrió en su quinta nomas así y no tiene idea de lo que hace. Pero hay evidencia que lo sustenta: https://t.co/5epac5FlSU
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally support woodlands. Read the report https://t.co/IsboQP2csn and find more facts in the #Cities4Forests #MediaKit 👉: https://t.co/0gjSzsgPzT
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
RT @Cities4Forests: Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally sup…
Increasing the global #forest canopy by 25% could store up to 205 gigatons of #carbon in areas that would naturally support woodlands. Read the report https://t.co/xkRs4rf8DL and find more facts in the #Cities4Forests #MediaKit 👉: https://t.co/5zfH1rkUDF
La #restauración de árboles sigue siendo una de las estrategias más eficaces para la mitigación del #cambioclimático https://t.co/xl9d2V35iq #desarrollosostenible #datos #IA #acciónclimática
@thestanceman1 @Stefan_Hajek Genaue Zahlen habe ich nicht im Kopf, ist aber auch nicht mein Fachgebiet. Die ETH Zürich hat da mal was publiziert, wurde aber recht kontrovers diskutiert. Aber diese Art von Ausgleich ist nur ein Tropfen auf den heißen Stein.
@pyradius The current estimates for maximum global afforestation mean ~200 gigatonnes of carbon storage, whereas we’re releasing 30+ gigatonnes a year It’s not bad to support afforestation programs! But clearly it’s not enough https://t.co/NgwPdUHDkA
Plants & soil absorb about 30% of human-caused emissions, but they could soak up more if forests and wetlands were restored. Planting an additional 900m hectares of forests could absorb enough carbon dioxide to negate the past 20 years of human emissio
7/ Mais la reforestation, contrairement à ce qui est indiqué dans cet article controversé, n'est en aucun cas LA solution à la question climatique. https://t.co/3wZze5CqkA
@_ppmv @dustieboots @elonmusk The paper in science. Open access. https://t.co/jKq4EfNrVC
@petrmares2 @GerberKawasaki @elonmusk The journal article mentioned in the Guardian article I linked. It does not go into an implementation strategy, just analyzing if it can work. https://t.co/PGbrBfIrwV
@ThomasCabaret84 @dr_l_alexandre @elonmusk 2 - Cet article de Science semble indiquer que la capture du carbone (en l'espèce par la reforestation) n'est pas forcément une piste si dérisoire. https://t.co/RPHJoGt2IL
😂 - with the science to back it up! "0.9 billion hectares of continuous forest... Such a change has the potential to store an equivalent of 25% of the current atmospheric carbon pool." https://t.co/ctlu7LgtOv
@petrmares2 @GerberKawasaki @elonmusk alternatively you can store the wood: https://t.co/CcpWltjOF5
@petrmares2 @joshjdill @GerberKawasaki @elonmusk Seems good to me... https://t.co/vno3NLaTqm
One of the rebuttals to the flawed paper of Bastin et al - evocating tree-planting as a considerable climate mitigation solution (https://t.co/BIppUpNH6b) now gets quantification https://t.co/OIZbXh2EUh: -> warming could result in “near halving of the
A study published in @ScienceMagazine found that planting #trees can be one of the best ways to offset the effects of global warming. “The restoration of trees remains among the most effective strategies for climate change mitigation.” https://t.co/Mfs
@Cities4Forests @markfischetti @sciam #reforestation #globaltrees the #global #tree restoration potential ! #climateAction >< #planttrees give thanks https://t.co/zKpnwyxzxL
RT @SimonLLewis: Science Magazine have lost their critical faculties — sequestering 200 billion tonnes carbon into trees would not reduce a…
@neurograce @AnneEUrai @GiveWell Same! I think if I could only pick one place then it’s planting trees, which has been shown to be the most effective carbon capture method to date (and it’s really cheap!), but I spread my donations, too. https://t.co/g58Pt
@calvinfroedge 4) Nuclear only solution to de-carbonization. No, forests work also, just take longer. https://t.co/BIr6zRdwb9
@Alkoholfreies_ @KSchwanke @herrfischer @zeitonline @FridayForFuture Es gibt in der Wissenschaft deutliche Kritik an dem Artikel von Bastin et al. (siehe link) aber auch die klare Aussage, dass wir natürlich mehr Wald und nature based solutions brauchen, a
@m_krohs @KSchwanke @zeitonline @FridayForFuture @CrowtherLab Aber gern. Es waren übrigens 5 kritische replies und wiederum eine Antwort von den Erstautoren auf diese. So geht gute Wissenschaft auch bei ernstem Thema. Alle diese sind auf der Webseite der O
(study: https://t.co/NgwPdUHDkA) that's not a bash against afforestation moments, but it's not nearly enough to solve our problem they're wanting to invest billions in Solar, but there's nothing to spare but empty pockets for CCUS tech? bullshit
"This highlights global tree #restoration as one of the most effective carbon drawdown solutions to date." https://t.co/6R3aPKaRfF #climatecrisis #restoration #drawdown #solution #treeplanting #biodiversity #greenrecovery @ScienceMagazine
RT @ScienceMagazine: Researchers report in Science that Earth could support enough additional trees to cut #carbon levels in the atmosphere…
@StarGTANews more tree need to planted. everywhere trees can be planted they should be. #planttreessaveearth!! in the cores of towns and in the cities all the way into forests. The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby
Source: Crowther Lab - ETH Zürich https://t.co/QVNE8Wqc23
"riverrun" From the deforested lands of Munster described by O'Rathaille, we, the scientist and artist who collided to form Skellig, set out on a journey in search of seedlings to ETH, MIT, Pasteur...and back to ETH: "The global tree restoration potential
@michaelmina_lab Stupid idea. Plant more trees and preserve the existing forests. Doesn’t anyone remember the carbon cycle. https://t.co/OJgI43CRO3
The #global #tree #restoration potential https://t.co/IMWaCtosZf
The global #tree restoration #potential https://t.co/axsuINheQf
3/ Trees became the giant, enviro elephant in the room: everybody loves them, even the sitting President. Notably, last year a study claimed that planting 1.2 trillion tree saplings on 1.7 billion hectares could remove 2/3rds of all human emissions: https
@ABC #PlantTrees Plant Trillions of trees in every state and territory of the US. In forests, rural areas, towns, cities, streets, parks. The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby
El potencial global de restauración de árboles https://t.co/lMyhDIh8o0
@nowthisnews Plant Multiple Trillions of trees in every country around the world. in cities to help with heat in the summers. clean up air pollution. bring birds back into cities. bring nature back into cities. #PlantTrees The global tree restoration poten
@Whoknew68534685 @JuliaTint @Nigel_Farage No. Trillion trees is from this study: https://t.co/yjymY1DEdG Hydrogen is being pursued (see IEA's https://t.co/Lwq9GicPN3 ), and more importantly, your "repeating yourself" reply showed that you hadn't even seen
RT @evilanova: @capelaez De acuerdo. El rollo es que todo este "hype" reciente de reforestación viene por un paper en Science del 2019 al q…
@capelaez De acuerdo. El rollo es que todo este "hype" reciente de reforestación viene por un paper en Science del 2019 al que le han encontrado muchas fallas. Para ser un paper con 8 respuestas me impresiona que no lo hayan retractado aún https://t.co/Swd
The global tree restoration potential | Science https://t.co/GFtnVWJ0z7