The global tree restoration potential

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @respiriamoinsie: Questo studio pubblicato su Science ha suscitato un acceso dibattito fra i ricercatori. Il modello proposto dagli auto…

Questo studio pubblicato su Science ha suscitato un acceso dibattito fra i ricercatori. Il modello proposto dagli autori è robusto? Le previsioni sono attendibili? Come associazione di pazienti, siamo felici che ci sia una discussione scientifica su un tem

C'e' bisogno di pagare Twitter per scrivere queste Catalanate? https://t.co/thR1NMtuvz

Are you listening, #Catholics? The restoration of trees remains among the most effective strategies for #ClimateChange mitigation. (Also required by God that we cultivate & care for creation.) #SaintKateriHabitat #CatholicTwitter https://t.co/8ccNxfFNK

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

#TLDR Al mondo ci sono 900 Mha di superfici "inutilizzate" che possono essere reimboschite: abbastanza da ricatturare circa un quarto della CO2 in eccesso. https://t.co/s8JMcEzvvB

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @verdegaiaGZ: Estudo pon de manifesto que a restauración global de árbores é unha das solucións máis eficaces de eliminación de carbono;…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @verdegaiaGZ: Estudo pon de manifesto que a restauración global de árbores é unha das solucións máis eficaces de eliminación de carbono;…

Estudo pon de manifesto que a restauración global de árbores é unha das solucións máis eficaces de eliminación de carbono; poderían almacenar 205 gigatoneladas de carbono. https://t.co/KHz6QrJLf6 #CriseClimática #BrigadasDeseucaliptizadoras

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

RT @SanofiIT: Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas se…

Gli alberi sono la nostra salvezza: basterebbero 800 milioni di ettari di nuove foreste per ridurre di oltre la metà i gas serra nell’atmosfera. Lo studio su Science https://t.co/7UpBJIw4H6 #buongiorno #18novembre https://t.co/JrIDESmToy

#consbioUSFCA https://t.co/AbmeUKugyX

We need to plant 500 billion trees providing 0.9 million hectares of additional canopy cover and storing 205 gigatons of CO2. https://t.co/xuFEmdTh63

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/N31MvWkPHg

@EdwinAl88882536 @GretaThunberg @voxdotcom So what is the actual solution you are advocating: UN's Green Climate Fund? Or "Restoring Forests" from the academic paper: https://t.co/N31MvWkPHg?

RT @lars_brudvig: Today in my restoration ecology class: how can restoration can help combat global change? We're discussing part of the r…

RT @lars_brudvig: Today in my restoration ecology class: how can restoration can help combat global change? We're discussing part of the r…

RT @ldoyle1043: The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/jsYiG8KaUf

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/jsYiG8KaUf

RT @lars_brudvig: Today in my restoration ecology class: how can restoration can help combat global change? We're discussing part of the r…

Today in my restoration ecology class: how can restoration can help combat global change? We're discussing part of the recent exchange on "The global tree restoration potential" (and also talking about scientific discourse) https://t.co/n2nrR0uQUG https:

@howiewolf If #ClimateChange problem = too much CO2, why assume solution requires *batteries* ? (which create far more Toxic byproducts than CO2 + means *DEPENDENCE on CHINA* for minerals!) Why not find Safer solutions to ⬇️ CO2? 🌳🌲 https://t.co/PG1

@howiewolf If problem = too much CO2, why assume solution must require *batteries* ??? (which create Far More Toxic byproducts than CO2 + means *total DEPENDENCE on CHINA* for minerals!). Why not find Safer solutions to ⬇️ CO2? 🌳🌲 https://t.co/PG13

@howiewolf If problem = too much CO2, why assume solution must require *batteries* ??? (which create Far More Toxic byproducts than CO2 + means *total DEPENDENCE on CHINA* for minerals!). Why not find Safer solutions to ⬇️ CO2? 🌳🌲 https://t.co/PG13

@jeffreycpacfa @MikeBloomberg If problem = too much CO2, why assume solution must require *batteries* ??? (which create Far More TOXIC byproducts than CO2 + means *total dependence on China* for minerals!). Why not find Safer solutions to ⬇️ CO2? 🌳🌲

@fragmansixty9 @vonderleyen @SvenjaSchulze @peteraltmaier @Markus_Soeder @RegSprecher @PIK_Klima @cducsubt @spdbt @GrueneBundestag @LinkeFraktion @Linksfraktion @TimmermansEU @IPCC_CH @SvenjaSchulze68 @fpd @KrVaSt @DavidLWindt @chriscartw83 @Jumpsteady @Cl

Planting trees: “the best climate change solution we have today”...https://t.co/d2IuXufxo3

@ONNO92048290 @DeNater Er is genoeg ruimte op de aarde om een biljoen (1000 miljard) extra bomen te planten. https://t.co/PxJlPBlLiH Zelfs als slechts een klein gedeelte daarvan (biodivers) productiebos is, kun je daarvan een heleboel gebouwen bouwen!

@DeNater Er is genoeg ruimte op de aarde om een biljoen (1000 miljard) extra bomen te planten. https://t.co/PxJlPBlLiH Zelfs als slechts een klein gedeelte daarvan (biodivers) productiebos is, kun je daarvan een heleboel gebouwen bouwen!

@christel_2 Er is genoeg ruimte op de aarde om een biljoen (1000 miljard) extra bomen te planten. https://t.co/PxJlPB49U7 Zelfs als slechts een klein gedeelte daarvan (biodivers) productiebos is, kun je daarvan een heleboel gebouwen bouwen!

A nice contribution from @adooorn! https://t.co/HzhiZ5uLVe

RT @sciencemagazine: Researchers report in Science that Earth could support enough additional trees to cut #carbon levels in the atmosphere…

@abuelo19801 @guanlopa @julia_otero @MAR88207499 @CiudadanosCs No citas ni uno y das generalidades. Por cierto donde más se preocupan los biólogos es en la plantación de árboles invasivos. Pero a seguir vendiendo humo. Esto es de un equipo de biólogos del

Where Would You Like Your Carbon? A Science Magazine says planting a billion trees could sequester and store up to 25 percent of global atmospheric carbon. https://t.co/cyIR2w5WKw

RT @KevinRichard_CH: The global tree restoration potential “This spatially explicit maps show how much additional tree cover could exist ou…

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/qNdsxGHkKE

RT @KevinRichard_CH: @teamtreesofficl could be interesting for you to join forces? These guys are behind this study on the potential for gl…

RT @KevinRichard_CH: @teamtreesofficl could be interesting for you to join forces? These guys are behind this study on the potential for gl…

@teamtreesofficl could be interesting for you to join forces? These guys are behind this study on the potential for global forest cover #TeamTrees 👉 https://t.co/oEg1wNr2zH They are calling for a change in the way we save forests 👉 https://t.co/dG3ARejWI

The global tree restoration potential “This spatially explicit maps show how much additional tree cover could exist outside of existing forests and agricultural and urban land.” 👉https://t.co/oEg1wNr2zH See also 👉 https://t.co/mjdJqzdr1X

Comentário “The global tree restoration potential” https://t.co/v7VjungllK sobre o trabalho dos pesquisadores que <https://t.co/owXzy1yAM7> superestimaram em cerca de 5x o potencial de captura de carbono

Or Bastin et al. (2019) Science: The tree restoration potential https://t.co/VuK00dBgBW

@ToughCookie91 @millerbethanyj @washingtonpost All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic solutions getting any attention?? 🌱🌳🌿🌲 (Much more sustainable than TOXIC batteries—mining & disposal—required for today’s

@MikeBloomberg All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic solutions getting any attention?? 🌱🌳🌿🌲 A lot more sustainable than the TOXIC waste in mining + disposing batteries! https://t.co/PG13bnXUPs https://t.co/oz

@MikeBloomberg @BloombergDotOrg @BeyondCarbon All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic solutions getting any attention?? 🌱🌳🌿🌲 A lot more sustainable compared to the TOXIC waste in mining + disposing batteries! ht

@POTMMBC @MikeBloomberg @BloombergDotOrg @BeyondCarbon All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic solutions getting any attention?? 🌱🌳🌿🌲 https://t.co/PG13bnXUPs https://t.co/ozXTyO1iIm

RT @LilaFlw: @pharmasean @Seeking_Honesty @cathymcmorris All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic…

@pharmasean @Seeking_Honesty @cathymcmorris All we need to do is remove CO2 from the atmosphere Why aren’t natural, NON-toxic solutions getting any attention?? https://t.co/qEcaYnIEFQ https://t.co/ozXTyO1iIm

Trees everywhere: a good idea. https://t.co/gacITdcr0i

RT @HajoLauf: The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/smnqpmIg5Z

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/smnqpmIg5Z

https://t.co/j2XcCqrccb

RT @Will4Planet: We need to plant 1Tn trees to pull down the CO2 & know *how* to plant them cheaply with drones ( https://t.co/L7zJJwndzf)…

@danfel22 @AlbertoBernalLe @sciencemagazine 2/2. https://t.co/Rx2o7ofO67, https://t.co/kyC0zBL7Zy

RT @virgiliocorrado: @WHO @WHOSEARO @WHOWPRO @pahowho @WHOAFRO @WHO_Europe @WHOEMRO @DrTedros @antonioguterres @UN #TeamTrees #PlantTrees…

@WHO @WHOSEARO @WHOWPRO @pahowho @WHOAFRO @WHO_Europe @WHOEMRO @DrTedros @antonioguterres @UN #TeamTrees #PlantTrees The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby

@oq_libra @JensGanman https://t.co/Zb9YNETAGe

#treescansaveus #ilovetrees https://t.co/JqCLjwaFW0 https://t.co/GqgDvBntbL

"The global tree restoration potential" https://t.co/C4IOCXegwt

@TorontoStar it would be a good thing. #PlantTrees is one way to clean the air we breath!! The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby

RT @CarbonRemovalAU: .@bast_jief and colleagues' original paper is found here https://t.co/JwamOkqXe2 and their reply to these criticisms…

.@bast_jief and colleagues' original paper is found here https://t.co/JwamOkqXe2 and their reply to these criticisms is here https://t.co/Wa1UvdTsXE. 11/12

@tictoc #PlantATrees so that the air people can be cleaned by billions of not more then Trillions of trees that are planted to replace those lost by fire or by people cutting them down. The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby

RT @alexander__lp: 10/19) 2. Fläche nutzen um aufzuforsten, insbesondere seit dieser Studie aus diesem Jahr https://t.co/1ttYAnkAld sollte…

@1o5Climate @ClimateLitigate @1o5CleanEnergy @Resilience1o5c #1o5c

@verge #PlantTrees in every town, city, forest, and rural area. The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/trb7M0Kjby

RT @alexander__lp: 10/19) 2. Fläche nutzen um aufzuforsten, insbesondere seit dieser Studie aus diesem Jahr https://t.co/1ttYAnkAld sollte…

@sigfig It wouldn’t actually be in the Sahara, that’s just to give a sense of scale, and 80 billion is too few. See the paper https://t.co/jfnvQ9ydoh Here’s their map of the actual sparse and globally distributed land areas suggested: https://t.co/HxDNxpRc

To be clear, 20 million trees is not nearly enough. Researchers predict that nearly 1 trillion trees are needed to tackle climate change https://t.co/9iEzk2xzeu . This however, is one the cheapest and easiest ways of tackling the climate crisis. Despite th

10/19) 2. Fläche nutzen um aufzuforsten, insbesondere seit dieser Studie aus diesem Jahr https://t.co/1ttYAnkAld sollte jedem das Potential von Wald für den Klimaschutz klar sein.

#Plantingtrees is an effective - low cost & actionable - practical step against #ClimateChange MSM https://t.co/XqYWqASZsO More technical https://t.co/fAXtlVUu6k

RT @NewAcreProject: Research from @ETH shows that planting billions of trees worldwide on land that isn’t used for farming is the most cost…

Research from @ETH shows that planting billions of trees worldwide on land that isn’t used for farming is the most cost-effective way of tackling the climate crisis. New Acre Project provides a Canadian mechanism to deliver on that investment. https://t.

@_julesh_ This paper claims 0.9 billion hectares; Earth’s land area is 14.9 billion hectares; that’s 6%. (I haven’t verified their reasoning.) I still agree that 6% of the planet is “almost inconceivable scale,” but estimated cost is only hundreds of billi

RT @ccasola: This paper was criticized by 3 Letters and 4 Technical Comments in the new issue of @sciencemagazine. 🤔 Full disclosure: some…

RT @ccasola: This paper was criticized by 3 Letters and 4 Technical Comments in the new issue of @sciencemagazine. 🤔 Full disclosure: some…

🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ Yes this is A Very Good Adjustment 🙄

RT @Cesar_Lutiako: I had never seen before a paper getting so many and well-founded criticisms as this one... Interesting to follow the ent…

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/EUSPdqOUcg #WOODYyouCITY

RT @drjoshlarsen: @michael_nielsen Then this recent controversy in science magazine is for you! Original paper: https://t.co/5Lc0XANILg one…

I had never seen before a paper getting so many and well-founded criticisms as this one... Interesting to follow the entire correspondence. https://t.co/zrIcSDdd1C

@michael_nielsen Then this recent controversy in science magazine is for you! Original paper: https://t.co/5Lc0XANILg one of many technical comments refuting the carbon balance in the paper https://t.co/5Lc0XANILg

RT @GUSTAVOMIRAV: The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/hJEAo5d8aw

The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/hJEAo5d8aw

RT @sciencemagazine: Researchers report in Science that Earth could support enough additional trees to cut #carbon levels in the atmosphere…

The best way to mitigate climate change.... The global tree restoration potential https://t.co/63JHx6NSJX