↓ Skip to main content

Digital Pathology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Digital Pathology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Bringing Open Data to Whole Slide Imaging
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 PanNuke: An Open Pan-Cancer Histology Dataset for Nuclei Instance Segmentation and Classification
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Active Learning for Patch-Based Digital Pathology Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Reduce Annotation Costs
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Patch Clustering for Representation of Histopathology Images
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Virtually Redying Histological Images with Generative Adversarial Networks to Facilitate Unsupervised Segmentation: A Proof-of-Concept Study
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Virtualization of Tissue Staining in Digital Pathology Using an Unsupervised Deep Learning Approach
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Evaluation of Colour Pre-processing on Patch-Based Classification of H&E-Stained Images
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Automated Segmentation of DCIS in Whole Slide Images
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Two-Stage U-Net Algorithm for Segmentation of Nuclei in H&E-Stained Tissues
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Automatic Detection of Tumor Buds in Pan-Cytokeratin Stained Colorectal Cancer Sections by a Hybrid Image Analysis Approach
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Improving Prostate Cancer Detection with Breast Histopathology Images
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Multi-tissue Partitioning for Whole Slide Images of Colorectal Cancer Histopathology Images with Deeptissue Net
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Rota-Net: Rotation Equivariant Network for Simultaneous Gland and Lumen Segmentation in Colon Histology Images
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Histopathological Image Analysis on Mouse Testes for Automated Staging of Mouse Seminiferous Tubule
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Deep Features for Tissue-Fold Detection in Histopathology Images
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Fast Pyramidal Bayesian Model for Mitosis Detection in Whole-Slide Images
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Improvement of Mitosis Detection Through the Combination of PHH3 and HE Features
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A New Paradigm of RNA-Signal Quantitation and Contextual Visualization for On-Slide Tissue Analysis
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Digital Tumor-Collagen Proximity Signature Predicts Survival in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 An Integrated Multi-scale Model for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification Using CNN-Pooling and Color-Texture Features
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Icytomine: A User-Friendly Tool for Integrating Workflows on Whole Slide Images
Attention for Chapter 11: Improving Prostate Cancer Detection with Breast Histopathology Images
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Improving Prostate Cancer Detection with Breast Histopathology Images
Chapter number 11
Book title
Digital Pathology
Published in
arXiv, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-23937-4_11
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-023936-7, 978-3-03-023937-4
Authors

Umair Akhtar Hasan Khan, Carolin Stürenberg, Oguzhan Gencoglu, Kevin Sandeman, Timo Heikkinen, Antti Rannikko, Tuomas Mirtti, Khan, Umair Akhtar Hasan, Stürenberg, Carolin, Gencoglu, Oguzhan, Sandeman, Kevin, Heikkinen, Timo, Rannikko, Antti, Mirtti, Tuomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 18 37%
Engineering 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,164,473
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#76,068
of 1,018,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,532
of 359,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#2,148
of 25,334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,018,032 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25,334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.