# Skewness of the elliptic flow distribution in $\sqrt{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}$ = 5.02~TeV PbPb collisions from HYDJET++ model

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, July 2019

• Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

## Mentioned by

2 tweeters

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title Skewness of the elliptic flow distribution in $\sqrt{s_{_{\mathrm{NN}}}}$ = 5.02~TeV PbPb collisions from HYDJET++ model arXiv, July 2019 10.1103/physrevc.101.034907 P. Cirkovic, J. Milosevic, L. Nadderd, F. Wang, X. Zhu

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

### Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

### Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 1 100%

## Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,728,093
of 16,026,148 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#362,794
of 634,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,303
of 265,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#17,061
of 29,867 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,026,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 634,678 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29,867 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.