↓ Skip to main content

Development of an oligonucleotide dye solution facilitates high throughput and cost-efficient chromosome identification in peanut

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of an oligonucleotide dye solution facilitates high throughput and cost-efficient chromosome identification in peanut
Published in
Plant Methods, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13007-019-0451-7
Authors

Pei Du, Caihong Cui, Hua Liu, Liuyang Fu, Lina Li, Xiaodong Dai, Li Qin, Siyu Wang, Suoyi Han, Jing Xu, Bing Liu, Bingyan Huang, Fengshou Tang, Wenzhao Dong, Zengjun Qi, Xinyou Zhang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Design 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#11,176,999
of 14,093,618 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#540
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,738
of 254,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,093,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them