↓ Skip to main content

By the content of their character? Discrimination, social identity, and observed distributions of income

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
By the content of their character? Discrimination, social identity, and observed distributions of income
Published in
The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/0022250x.2019.1630832
Authors

Paulo L. dos Santos, Noé Wiener

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,761,934
of 15,020,800 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
#14
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,943
of 258,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,020,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them