You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guideline-based quality indicators—a systematic comparison of German and international clinical practice guidelines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0918-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Monika Becker, Jessica Breuing, Monika Nothacker, Stefanie Deckert, Marie Brombach, Jochen Schmitt, Edmund Neugebauer, Dawid Pieper |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 17% |
Colombia | 1 | 17% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 28% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#13,133,723
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,338
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,005
of 346,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#30
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.