↓ Skip to main content

Understanding climate change from a global analysis of city analogues

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 224,877)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
Title
Understanding climate change from a global analysis of city analogues
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0217592
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Francois Bastin, Emily Clark, Thomas Elliott, Simon Hart, Johan van den Hoogen, Iris Hordijk, Haozhi Ma, Sabiha Majumder, Gabriele Manoli, Julia Maschler, Lidong Mo, Devin Routh, Kailiang Yu, Constantin M. Zohner, Thomas W. Crowther

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 377 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 17%
Student > Master 51 14%
Researcher 49 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Other 17 5%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 104 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 57 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 9%
Engineering 29 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 6%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Other 84 22%
Unknown 135 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2281. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,695
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#40
of 224,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47
of 361,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2
of 2,623 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,623 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.