You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SNUGB: a versatile genome browser supporting comparative and functional fungal genomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-9-586 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyongyong Jung, Jongsun Park, Jaeyoung Choi, Bongsoo Park, Seungill Kim, Kyohun Ahn, Jaehyuk Choi, Doil Choi, Seogchan Kang, Yong-Hwan Lee |
| Abstract |
Since the full genome sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were released in 1996, genome sequences of over 90 fungal species have become publicly available. The heterogeneous formats of genome sequences archived in different sequencing centers hampered the integration of the data for efficient and comprehensive comparative analyses. The Comparative Fungal Genomics Platform (CFGP) was developed to archive these data via a single standardized format that can support multifaceted and integrated analyses of the data. To facilitate efficient data visualization and utilization within and across species based on the architecture of CFGP and associated databases, a new genome browser was needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Professor | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#8,141
of 10,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,168
of 165,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#115
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.