↓ Skip to main content

Accelerated partial breast irradiation: advances and controversies

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Communications, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accelerated partial breast irradiation: advances and controversies
Published in
Cancer Communications, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40880-016-0095-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mani Akhtari, Bin S Teh

Abstract

The management of localized breast cancer has changed dramatically over the past three to four decades. Breast-conserving therapy, which involved lumpectomy followed by adjuvant irradiation, is now widely considered the standard of care in women with early-stage breast cancer. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), which involves focal irradiation of the lumpectomy cavity over a short period of time, has developed over the past two decades as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI). Multiple APBI modalities have been developed including brachytherapy, external beam irradiation, and intraoperative irradiation. These new techniques have provided early-stage breast cancer patients with shorter treatment duration and more focused irradiation, delivering very high biological doses to the region at a high risk of failures over a much shorter treatment course as compared with conventional radiotherapy. However, the advantages of APBI over conventional radiotherapy are controversial, including a higher risk of complications reported in retrospective literature and shorter follow-up duration in the intraoperative APBI trials. Nevertheless, APBI presents a valuable alternative to WBI for a selected population of women with early-stage breast cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 36%