You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning and End of the Scythian Dominance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mari Järve, Lehti Saag, Christiana Lyn Scheib, Ajai K Pathak, Francesco Montinaro, Luca Pagani, Rodrigo Flores, Meriam Guellil, Lauri Saag, Kristiina Tambets, Alena Kushniarevich, Anu Solnik, Liivi Varul, Stanislav Zadnikov, Oleg Petrauskas, Maryana Avramenko, Boris Magomedov, Serghii Didenko, Gennadi Toshev, Igor Bruyako, Denys Grechko, Vitalii Okatenko, Kyrylo Gorbenko, Oleksandr Smyrnov, Anatolii Heiko, Roman Reida, Serheii Sapiehin, Sergey Sirotin, Aleksandr Tairov, Arman Beisenov, Maksim Starodubtsev, Vitali Vasilev, Alexei Nechvaloda, Biyaslan Atabiev, Sergey Litvinov, Natalia Ekomasova, Murat Dzhaubermezov, Sergey Voroniatov, Olga Utevska, Irina Shramko, Elza Khusnutdinova, Mait Metspalu, Nikita Savelev, Aivar Kriiska, Toomas Kivisild, Richard Villems |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Estonia | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 70% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#796,606
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,593
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,981
of 363,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#57
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.