↓ Skip to main content

The Failure of Instrumental Arguments for a Human Right to Democracy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Political Philosophy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Failure of Instrumental Arguments for a Human Right to Democracy
Published in
Journal of Political Philosophy, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/jopp.12197
Authors

Ryan Pevnick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,416,699
of 13,661,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Political Philosophy
#188
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,476
of 248,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Political Philosophy
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,661,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.