↓ Skip to main content

The Failure of Instrumental Arguments for a Human Right to Democracy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Political Philosophy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Failure of Instrumental Arguments for a Human Right to Democracy
Published in
Journal of Political Philosophy, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/jopp.12197
Authors

Ryan Pevnick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Philosophy 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,657,828
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Political Philosophy
#280
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,559
of 353,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Political Philosophy
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.