You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The “Beam-Me-In Strategy” – remote haptic therapist-patient interaction with two exoskeletons for stroke therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0547-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kilian Baur, Nina Rohrbach, Joachim Hermsdörfer, Robert Riener, Verena Klamroth-Marganska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 23% |
| Unknown | 37 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,048,427
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#795
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,473
of 346,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#27
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.