↓ Skip to main content

Non-coding RNA and the Reproductive System

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Non-coding RNAs in Uterine Development, Function and Disease.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Non-coding RNAs in Uterine Development, Function and Disease.
Chapter number 9
Book title
Non-coding RNA and the Reproductive System
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-7417-8_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-177415-4, 978-9-40-177417-8
Authors

Warren B. Nothnick Ph.D., Warren B. Nothnick, Nothnick, Warren B.

Editors

Dagmar Wilhelm, Pascal Bernard

Abstract

The major function of the uterus is to accept and provide a suitable environment for an embryo, ultimately leading the birth of offspring and successful propagation of the species. For this occur, there must be precise coordination of hormonal signalling within both the endometrial and myometrial components of this organ. Non-coding RNAs, specifically, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to be essential for normal uterine development and function. Within this organ, miRNAs are proposed to fine-tune the actions of the female steroid hormones estradiol and progesterone. Not surprising, mis-expression of miRNAs has been documented in diseases of the endometrium and myometrium such as endometriosis and leiomyomas, respectively. In this chapter, I will review the current understanding on the role, regulation and function of non-coding RNAs focusing on miRNAs in both the normal physiology of the endometrium and myometrium as well as in pathologies of these tissues, namely endometriosis and leiomyomas.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Psychology 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,477,524
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,230
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,722
of 388,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#110
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.