↓ Skip to main content

Dreissenid (quagga and zebra mussel) veligers are adversely affected by bloom forming cyanobacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Dreissenid (quagga and zebra mussel) veligers are adversely affected by bloom forming cyanobacteria
Published in
Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109426
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna G. Boegehold, Nicholas S. Johnson, Donna R. Kashian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Engineering 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,342,420
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#589
of 8,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,870
of 360,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#12
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.