You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of two strategies for debriefing simulation in the development of skills for neonatal resuscitation: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-018-3831-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oscar Andrés Gamboa, Sergio Iván Agudelo, María Jose Maldonado, Diana C. Leguizamón, Sandra M. Cala |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 43% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 132 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 53 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 22% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,449,806
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#984
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,160
of 348,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#26
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.