↓ Skip to main content

Normal-Appearing Cerebellar Damage in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normal-Appearing Cerebellar Damage in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, June 2019
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a6098
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Sun, N. Zhang, Q. Wang, X. Zhang, W. Qin, L. Yang, F.-D. Shi, C. Yu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#9,052,294
of 15,448,505 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#2,256
of 3,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,503
of 261,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#50
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,448,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.