You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increase in weighting of vision vs. proprioception associated with force field adaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-46625-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandon M. Sexton, Yang Liu, Hannah J. Block |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Canada | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,614,781
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#30,816
of 136,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,810
of 352,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#808
of 3,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.