↓ Skip to main content

Orthotic devices for the treatment of tennis elbow

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Orthotic devices for the treatment of tennis elbow
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001821
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter AA Struijs, Nynke Smidt, H Arola, C N van Dijk, Rachelle Buchbinder, Willem JJ Assendelft

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 102 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 19%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 21 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,917,582
of 15,641,077 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,657
of 11,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,970
of 262,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,641,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.