You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome, Part 1: Fundamental Imaging and Clinical Features
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a0928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
W S Bartynski |
| Abstract |
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurotoxic state coupled with a unique CT or MR imaging appearance. Recognized in the setting of a number of complex conditions (preeclampsia/eclampsia, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, organ transplantation, autoimmune disease and high dose chemotherapy) the imaging, clinical and laboratory features of this toxic state are becoming better elucidated. This review summarizes the basic and advanced imaging features of PRES, along with pertinent features of the clinical and laboratory presentation and available histopathology. Many common imaging/clinical/laboratory observations are present among these patients, despite the perception of widely different associated clinical conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 590 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 560 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 99 | 17% |
| Researcher | 85 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 79 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 48 | 8% |
| Other | 150 | 25% |
| Unknown | 77 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 408 | 69% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Psychology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Unknown | 93 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,182,096
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#121
of 5,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,544
of 85,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.