↓ Skip to main content

Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome, Part 1: Fundamental Imaging and Clinical Features

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
648 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome, Part 1: Fundamental Imaging and Clinical Features
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2008
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a0928
Pubmed ID
Authors

W.S. Bartynski

Abstract

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurotoxic state coupled with a unique CT or MR imaging appearance. Recognized in the setting of a number of complex conditions (preeclampsia/eclampsia, allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, organ transplantation, autoimmune disease and high dose chemotherapy) the imaging, clinical and laboratory features of this toxic state are becoming better elucidated. This review summarizes the basic and advanced imaging features of PRES, along with pertinent features of the clinical and laboratory presentation and available histopathology. Many common imaging/clinical/laboratory observations are present among these patients, despite the perception of widely different associated clinical conditions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 385 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 81 19%
Researcher 75 18%
Student > Postgraduate 71 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 9%
Other 111 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 340 82%
Unspecified 30 7%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Psychology 6 1%
Other 13 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#742,083
of 13,595,880 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#67
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,742
of 119,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,595,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.