↓ Skip to main content

Geographic context affects the landscape change and fragmentation caused by wind energy facilities

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geographic context affects the landscape change and fragmentation caused by wind energy facilities
Published in
PeerJ, July 2019
DOI 10.7717/peerj.7129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay E. Diffendorfer, Monica A. Dorning, Jolene R. Keen, Louisa A. Kramer, Robert V. Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Psychology 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 4 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,336,740
of 15,462,543 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#4,902
of 8,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,609
of 260,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#48
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,462,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.