You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tenosynovial giant cell tumor: case report of a patient effectively treated with pexidartinib (PLX3397) and review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Sarcoma Research, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13569-018-0101-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas Giustini, Nicholas M. Bernthal, Susan V. Bukata, Arun S. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,588,963
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#33
of 106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,157
of 339,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 106 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.