↓ Skip to main content

Considerations in Harmful Algal Bloom Research and Monitoring: Perspectives From a Consensus-Building Workshop and Technology Testing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Considerations in Harmful Algal Bloom Research and Monitoring: Perspectives From a Consensus-Building Workshop and Technology Testing
Published in
Frontiers in Marine Science, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fmars.2019.00399
Authors

Beth A. Stauffer, Holly A. Bowers, Earle Buckley, Timothy W. Davis, Thomas H. Johengen, Raphael Kudela, Margaret A. McManus, Heidi Purcell, G. Jason Smith, Andrea Vander Woude, Mario N. Tamburri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 206 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Professor 9 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 70 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 47 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Engineering 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 81 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,668,218
of 23,454,152 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#2,798
of 8,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,252
of 347,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#122
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,454,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.