You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated digital error suppression for improved detection of circulating tumor DNA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Biotechnology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nbt.3520 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron M Newman, Alexander F Lovejoy, Daniel M Klass, David M Kurtz, Jacob J Chabon, Florian Scherer, Henning Stehr, Chih Long Liu, Scott V Bratman, Carmen Say, Li Zhou, Justin N Carter, Robert B West, George W Sledge Jr, Joseph B Shrager, Billy W Loo, Joel W Neal, Heather A Wakelee, Maximilian Diehn, Ash A Alizadeh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 22% |
| Spain | 8 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Japan | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 64 | 58% |
| Scientists | 30 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 903 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 885 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 219 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 8% |
| Other | 62 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 6% |
| Other | 143 | 16% |
| Unknown | 205 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 238 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 184 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 15% |
| Engineering | 27 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 2% |
| Other | 59 | 7% |
| Unknown | 246 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 160. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#262,460
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#567
of 8,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,627
of 316,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#15
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.