You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficiency and effectiveness of utilizing diagrams in interviews: an assessment of participatory diagramming and graphic elicitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muriah J Umoquit, Mark J Dobrow, Louise Lemieux-Charles, Paul G Ritvo, David R Urbach, Walter P Wodchis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 24% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
| Design | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 30% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,434,356
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#971
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,011
of 83,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.