You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating aboveground net biomass change for tropical and subtropical forests: Refinement of IPCC default rates using forest plot data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.14767 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Requena Suarez, Danaë M. A. Rozendaal, Veronique De Sy, Oliver L. Phillips, Esteban Alvarez‐Dávila, Kristina Anderson‐Teixeira, Alejandro Araujo‐Murakami, Luzmila Arroyo, Timothy R. Baker, Frans Bongers, Roel J. W. Brienen, Sarah Carter, Susan C. Cook‐Patton, Ted R. Feldpausch, Bronson W. Griscom, Nancy Harris, Bruno Hérault, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Sara M. Leavitt, Simon L. Lewis, Beatriz S. Marimon, Abel Monteagudo Mendoza, Justin Kassi N'dja, Anny Estelle N'Guessan, Lourens Poorter, Lan Qie, Ervan Rutishauser, Plinio Sist, Bonaventure Sonké, Martin J. P. Sullivan, Emilio Vilanova, Maria M. H. Wang, Christopher Martius, Martin Herold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 18% |
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 69% |
| Scientists | 14 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 275 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 81 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 74 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 100 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,187,518
of 25,517,918 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#1,451
of 6,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,012
of 338,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#42
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,517,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.