↓ Skip to main content

Application of multiple‐population viability analysis to evaluate species recovery alternatives

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Biology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of multiple‐population viability analysis to evaluate species recovery alternatives
Published in
Conservation Biology, September 2019
DOI 10.1111/cobi.13385
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen M. Neville, Douglas R. Leasure, Daniel C. Dauwalter, Jason B. Dunham, Robin Bjork, Kurt A. Fesenmyer, Nathan D. Chelgren, Mary M. Peacock, Charles H. Luce, Daniel J. Isaak, Lee Ann Carranza, Jon Sjoberg, Seth J. Wenger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Environmental Science 3 27%
Mathematics 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,348,552
of 13,976,883 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,452
of 2,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,147
of 200,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,976,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.