Title |
Determination of an unrelated donor pool size for human leukocyte antigen-matched platelets in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.10.005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolina Bonet Bub, Margareth Afonso Torres, Maria Elisa Moraes, Nelson Hamerschlak, José Mauro Kutner |
Abstract |
Successful transfusion of platelet refractory patients is a challenge. Many potential donors are needed to sustain human leukocyte antigen matched-platelet transfusion programs because of the different types of antigens and the constant needs of these patients. For a highly mixed population such as the Brazilian population, the pool size required to provide adequate platelet support is unknown. A mathematical model was created to estimate the appropriate size of an unrelated donor pool to provide human leukocyte antigen-compatible platelet support for a Brazilian population. A group of 154 hematologic human leukocyte antigen-typed patients was used as the potential patient population and a database of 65,500 human leukocyte antigen-typed bone marrow registered donors was used as the donor population. Platelet compatibility was based on the grading system of Duquesnoy. Using the mathematical model, a pool containing 31,940, 1710 and 321 donors would be necessary to match more than 80% of the patients with at least five completely compatible (no cross-reactive group), partial compatible (one cross-reactive group) or less compatible (two cross-reactive group) donors, respectively. The phenotypic diversity of the Brazilian population has probably made it more difficulty to find completely compatible donors. However, this heterogeneity seems to have facilitated finding donors when cross-reactive groups are accepted as proposed by the grading system of Duquesnoy. The results of this study may help to establish unrelated human leukocyte antigen-compatible platelet transfusions, a procedure not routinely performed in most Brazilian transfusion services. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 19% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |