You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Framing the concept of satellite remote sensing essential biodiversity variables: challenges and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/rse2.15 |
| Authors |
Nathalie Pettorelli, Martin Wegmann, Andrew Skidmore, Sander Mücher, Terence P. Dawson, Miguel Fernandez, Richard Lucas, Michael E. Schaepman, Tiejun Wang, Brian O'Connor, Robert H.G. Jongman, Pieter Kempeneers, Ruth Sonnenschein, Allison K. Leidner, Monika Böhm, Kate S. He, Harini Nagendra, Grégoire Dubois, Temilola Fatoyinbo, Matthew C. Hansen, Marc Paganini, Helen M. de Klerk, Gregory P. Asner, Jeremy T. Kerr, Anna B. Estes, Dirk S. Schmeller, Uta Heiden, Duccio Rocchini, Henrique M. Pereira, Eren Turak, Nestor Fernandez, Angela Lausch, Moses A. Cho, Domingo Alcaraz‐Segura, Mélodie A. McGeoch, Woody Turner, Andreas Mueller, Véronique St‐Louis, Johannes Penner, Petteri Vihervaara, Alan Belward, Belinda Reyers, Gary N. Geller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 19% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 65% |
| Scientists | 19 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 663 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 641 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 155 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 118 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 99 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 115 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 236 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 148 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 75 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 5% |
| Unknown | 148 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#596,869
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#21
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,736
of 318,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them