You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
FLUXNET-CH4 Synthesis Activity: Objectives, Observations, and Future Directions FLUXNET-CH4 Synthesis Activity: Objectives, Observations, and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1175/bams-d-18-0268.1 |
| Authors |
Sara H. Knox, Robert B. Jackson, Benjamin Poulter, Gavin McNicol, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Zhen Zhang, Gustaf Hugelius, Philippe Bousquet, Josep G. Canadell, Marielle Saunois, Dario Papale, Housen Chu, Trevor F. Keenan, Dennis Baldocchi, Margaret S. Torn, Ivan Mammarella, Carlo Trotta, Mika Aurela, Gil Bohrer, David I. Campbell, Alessandro Cescatti, Samuel Chamberlain, Jiquan Chen, Weinan Chen, Sigrid Dengel, Ankur R. Desai, Eugenie Euskirchen, Thomas Friborg, Daniele Gasbarra, Ignacio Goded, Mathias Goeckede, Martin Heimann, Manuel Helbig, Takashi Hirano, David Y. Hollinger, Hiroki Iwata, Minseok Kang, Janina Klatt, Ken W. Krauss, Lars Kutzbach, Annalea Lohila, Bhaskar Mitra, Timothy H. Morin, Mats B. Nilsson, Shuli Niu, Asko Noormets, Walter C. Oechel, Matthias Peichl, Olli Peltola, Michele L. Reba, Andrew D. Richardson, Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Youngryel Ryu, Torsten Sachs, Karina V. R. Schäfer, Hans Peter Schmid, Narasinha Shurpali, Oliver Sonnentag, Angela C. I. Tang, Masahito Ueyama, Rodrigo Vargas, Timo Vesala, Eric J. Ward, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Georg Wohlfahrt, Donatella Zona |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
| Finland | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 62% |
| Scientists | 22 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 45 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,004,685
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#315
of 3,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,697
of 346,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.