You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genome and epigenome wide studies of neurological protein biomarkers in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-11177-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert F. Hillary, Daniel L. McCartney, Sarah E. Harris, Anna J. Stevenson, Anne Seeboth, Qian Zhang, David C. Liewald, Kathryn L. Evans, Craig W. Ritchie, Elliot M. Tucker-Drob, Naomi R. Wray, Allan F. McRae, Peter M. Visscher, Ian J. Deary, Riccardo E. Marioni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 43% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Qatar | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Comoros | 1 | 4% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
Scientists | 5 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Professor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 24% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,135,006
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#17,111
of 46,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,831
of 345,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#512
of 1,440 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,440 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.