↓ Skip to main content

Fields of Practice: Symbolic Binding and the Qing Defense of Sinocentric Diplomacy

Overview of attention for article published in International Studies Quarterly, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,088)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fields of Practice: Symbolic Binding and the Qing Defense of Sinocentric Diplomacy
Published in
International Studies Quarterly, July 2019
DOI 10.1093/isq/sqz054
Authors

David E Banks

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#335,401
of 21,500,234 outputs
Outputs from International Studies Quarterly
#28
of 1,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,116
of 279,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Studies Quarterly
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,500,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.