↓ Skip to main content

Progression and metastasis of lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 840)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
387 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
Title
Progression and metastasis of lung cancer
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10555-016-9618-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut H. Popper

Abstract

Metastasis in lung cancer is a multifaceted process. In this review, we will dissect the process in several isolated steps such as angiogenesis, hypoxia, circulation, and establishment of a metastatic focus. In reality, several of these processes overlap and occur even simultaneously, but such a presentation would be unreadable. Metastasis requires cell migration toward higher oxygen tension, which is based on changing the structure of the cell (epithelial-mesenchymal transition), orientation within the stroma and stroma interaction, and communication with the immune system to avoid attack. Once in the blood stream, cells have to survive trapping by the coagulation system, to survive shear stress in small blood vessels, and to find the right location for extravasation. Once outside in the metastatic locus, tumor cells have to learn the communication with the "foreign" stroma cells to establish vascular supply and again express molecules, which induce immune tolerance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 459 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 15%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Student > Master 58 13%
Researcher 29 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 166 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Engineering 19 4%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 183 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,988,703
of 24,063,285 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#31
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,307
of 305,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,063,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them