You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health professions digital education on clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review by Digital Health Education collaboration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1370-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorainne Tudor Car, Aijia Soong, Bhone Myint Kyaw, Kee Leng Chua, Naomi Low-Beer, Azeem Majeed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 47% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Singapore | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 23% |
| Unknown | 97 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 99 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,803,760
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,982
of 3,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,900
of 347,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#38
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.