↓ Skip to main content

Cash Transfers and Gender Differentials in Child Schooling and Labor: Evidence from the Lesotho Child Grants Programme

Overview of attention for article published in Population & Development Review, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cash Transfers and Gender Differentials in Child Schooling and Labor: Evidence from the Lesotho Child Grants Programme
Published in
Population & Development Review, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/padr.12269
Authors

Ashwini Sebastian, Ana Paula la O Campos, Silvio Daidone, Noemi Pace, Benjamin Davis, Ousmane Niang, Luca Pellerano

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 40%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Philosophy 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#965,264
of 17,015,490 outputs
Outputs from Population & Development Review
#108
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,407
of 264,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population & Development Review
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,015,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.