↓ Skip to main content

InteractionFusion

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
InteractionFusion
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2019
DOI 10.1145/3306346.3322998
Authors

Hao Zhang, Zi-Hao Bo, Jun-Hai Yong, Feng Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 66%
Engineering 3 10%
Unknown 7 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#9,837,364
of 15,465,366 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,788
of 1,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,512
of 259,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,465,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.