You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-662-49665-7 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-66-249664-0, 978-3-66-249665-7
|
| Authors |
Aspinall, David, Kaliszyk, Cezary |
| Editors |
Perdita Stevens, Andrzej Wąsowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,673,200
of 23,983,331 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#280
of 8,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,784
of 400,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#64
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.