You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification, prevalence and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of Capsicum annuum in Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
IMA Fungus, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43008-019-0001-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dilani D. de Silva, Johannes Z. Groenewald, Pedro W. Crous, Peter K. Ades, Andi Nasruddin, Orarat Mongkolporn, Paul W. J. Taylor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 84 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 88 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from IMA Fungus
#117
of 254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,705
of 365,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IMA Fungus
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.