↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Perceptual-versus-Interpretative Errors in Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors for Perceptual-versus-Interpretative Errors in Diagnostic Neuroradiology
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, July 2019
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a6125
Pubmed ID
Authors

S.H. Patel, C.L. Stanton, S.G. Miller, J.T. Patrie, J.N. Itri, T.M. Shepherd

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#861,160
of 13,412,055 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#91
of 3,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,673
of 186,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,412,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.