↓ Skip to main content

岡山県倉敷市におけるナゴヤダルマガエルの越冬環境

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
岡山県倉敷市におけるナゴヤダルマガエルの越冬環境
Published in
Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, July 2019
DOI 10.11408/jsidre.87.i_179
Authors

多田 正和, 伊藤 邦夫, 齋藤 稔, 森 也寸志, 福桝 純平, 中田 和義

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2022.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering
#9
of 34 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,418
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them