You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Planktonic Bacterial Communities in Mountain Lake Ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Structure and Function of Mountain Ecosystems in Japan
|
| Published in |
Ecological Research Monographs, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-4-431-55954-2_7 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-4-43-155952-8, 978-4-43-155954-2
|
| Authors |
Masanori Fujii, Toshihide Hirao, Hisaya Kojima, Manabu Fukui |
| Editors |
Gaku Kudo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,796,296
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Research Monographs
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,739
of 316,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Research Monographs
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them