↓ Skip to main content

Water balloon-induced orbital fracture in an aviator

Overview of attention for article published in Military Medical Research, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Water balloon-induced orbital fracture in an aviator
Published in
Military Medical Research, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40779-019-0210-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy E. Holland, David M. Smith, Guy N. Gibson, Jared G. Brinkerhoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,294,844
of 15,474,261 outputs
Outputs from Military Medical Research
#139
of 195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,413
of 260,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Military Medical Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,474,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them