You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo de pacientes con fibrilación auricular en el Seguro Social del Perú (EsSalud)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Anales de la Facultad de Medicina, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.15381/anales.802.16424 |
| Authors |
Richard Soto-Becerra, Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka, Sergio Goicochea-Lugo, Christoper A. Alarcón-Ruiz, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alvaro Taype-Rondan, Carolina Guevara-Caicedo, Gladys Espinoza-Rivas, Mario Cabrera-Saldaña, Pío Zelaya-Castro, Ricardo Zegarra-Carhuaz, Diana Urday-Ipanaqué, Raúl Timaná-Ruiz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Anales de la Facultad de Medicina
#48
of 113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,634
of 365,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anales de la Facultad de Medicina
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 113 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them