You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009485 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorothee Amelung, Katriina L Whitaker, Debby Lennard, Margaret Ogden, Jessica Sheringham, Yin Zhou, Fiona M Walter, Hardeep Singh, Charles Vincent, Georgia Black |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 37 | 39% |
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 49% |
| Scientists | 23 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#737,546
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#271
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,454
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.