You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Planning dietary improvements without additional costs for low-income individuals in Brazil: linear programming optimization as a tool for public policy in nutrition and health
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-019-0466-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eliseu Verly-Jr, Rosely Sichieri, Nicole Darmon, Matthieu Maillot, Flavia Mori Sarti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 52 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Mathematics | 5 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 21% |
Unknown | 60 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,862,921
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#615
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,683
of 358,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.