↓ Skip to main content

Noninvasive diagnosis of chemotherapy induced liver injury by LiMAx test – two case reports and a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Noninvasive diagnosis of chemotherapy induced liver injury by LiMAx test – two case reports and a review of the literature
Published in
BMC Research Notes, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1055-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Bednarsch, Maximilian Jara, Johan Friso Lock, Maciej Malinowski, Johann Pratschke, Martin Stockmann

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced liver injury is a well-known phenomenon after neoadjuvant therapy of liver metastasis and contributes to postoperative morbidity and mortality. Still there is no suitable test available to determine functional impairment and hepatic regeneration after chemotherapy reliably. We report two cases of caucasian patients who underwent repeated liver function assessments using LiMAx (maximum liver function capacity), Indocyanine plasma disappearance rate and biochemical liver function parameters in the course of adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Both patients yielded a decrease from their initial liver function determined by LiMAx. Liver regeneration assessed functional recovery within 4 weeks in case of mild functional impairment after cessation of chemotherapy or within 8 weeks in case of major functional deterioration. Indocyanine plasma disappearance rate and biochemical parameters remained stable or without a clear trend in case of minor functional impairment. This is the first report using a dynamic liver function test to evaluate the impact and recovery from chemotherapy associated liver injury. The LiMAx test might be a sensitive tool to diagnose mild functional impairment after chemotherapy when standard liver function tests have remained within normal ranges and might be capable to assess the course of regeneration after chemotherapy. This could be useful to optimize individual chemotherapy-free interval before liver surgery can be carried out safely.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Other 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,232,713
of 22,858,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,168
of 4,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,908
of 263,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#28
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,858,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.