You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Noncoding CGG repeat expansions in neuronal intranuclear inclusion disease, oculopharyngodistal myopathy and an overlapping disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41588-019-0458-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroyuki Ishiura, Shota Shibata, Jun Yoshimura, Yuta Suzuki, Wei Qu, Koichiro Doi, M. Asem Almansour, Junko Kanda Kikuchi, Makiko Taira, Jun Mitsui, Yuji Takahashi, Yaeko Ichikawa, Tatsuo Mano, Atsushi Iwata, Yasuo Harigaya, Miho Kawabe Matsukawa, Takashi Matsukawa, Masaki Tanaka, Yuichiro Shirota, Ryo Ohtomo, Hisatomo Kowa, Hidetoshi Date, Aki Mitsue, Hiroyuki Hatsuta, Satoru Morimoto, Shigeo Murayama, Yasushi Shiio, Yuko Saito, Akihiko Mitsutake, Mizuho Kawai, Takuya Sasaki, Yusuke Sugiyama, Masashi Hamada, Gaku Ohtomo, Yasuo Terao, Yoshihiko Nakazato, Akitoshi Takeda, Yoshio Sakiyama, Yumi Umeda-Kameyama, Jun Shinmi, Katsuhisa Ogata, Yutaka Kohno, Shen-Yang Lim, Ai Huey Tan, Jun Shimizu, Jun Goto, Ichizo Nishino, Tatsushi Toda, Shinichi Morishita, Shoji Tsuji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| Japan | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 48% |
| Scientists | 10 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 217 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 33 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 386. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#80,819
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#116
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,472
of 362,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.