↓ Skip to main content

Too much medicine and the poor climate of trust (authors’ response)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Too much medicine and the poor climate of trust (authors’ response)
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, July 2019
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2019-105401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoe Fritz, Richard J Holton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,911,558
of 13,722,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#2,194
of 2,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,554
of 248,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#45
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,722,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.